<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MarkSkaggs.com: Fast, Light and Right &#187; THQ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markskaggs.com/category/thq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markskaggs.com</link>
	<description>Making games and other interesting adventures</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:56:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>EA and Take Two &#8211; a $2 billion bargain</title>
		<link>http://markskaggs.com/ea/ea-and-take-two-a-2-billion-bargain/</link>
		<comments>http://markskaggs.com/ea/ea-and-take-two-a-2-billion-bargain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 06:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Skaggs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Take-Two]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTA4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markskaggs.com/ea/ea-and-take-two-a-2-billion-bargain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the release of GTA4, I looked at the EA bid for Take Two again.
It&#8217;s still a numbers game.
Literally.
EA needs to grow. It&#8217;s stock has been stalled for the past few years (forget for a minute that company execs have heavy stock option components to their compensation).
EA wants to acquire Take Two&#8217;s revenue (about $1bn) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>With the release of GTA4, I looked at the EA bid for Take Two again.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still a numbers game.</p>
<p>Literally.</p>
<p>EA needs to grow. It&#8217;s stock has been stalled for the past few years (forget for a minute that company execs have heavy stock option components to their compensation).</p>
<p>EA wants to acquire Take Two&#8217;s revenue (about $1bn) and have that revenue show up in EA finanicals.</p>
<p>Since EA has a Forward P/E of approx 30 while Take Two&#8217;s is approx 16, EA wins big time with an extra 900mm to 1bn in revenue run through it&#8217;s financial ratios.</p>
<p>Is Take Two worth 2 billion? Sure, more too, esp given EA&#8217;s ratios.</p>
<p>If EA can capture the 1 billion in revenue this year and get the huge upswing in it&#8217;s stock price, I think it&#8217;s worth more than 2 billion.</p>
<p>Even if Take Two&#8217;s revenues drop in 1/2 after this year, EA will be paid back in 3 years rather than 2.</p>
<p>The other hidden factors to consider. First are the gains from acquiring the IP from Take Two.</p>
<p>EA does amazingly well at exploiting IP it acquires &#8211; at least for the first few years &#8211; so there is more revenue to be had, even when sales of GTA4 drop off.</p>
<p>Second is the shift in sports games landscape once EA Sports and 2k Sports are brought together under one roof.</p>
<p>$2bn is looking like a bargin for EA.</p>
<p>I think Take Two knows it.</p>
<p>If EA doesn&#8217;t get the additional $1bn in revenue from acquiring Take Two&#8230;one wonders where it will come from&#8230;</p>
<p>Activision is too big now&#8230;..anyone else thinking &#8220;THQ&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://markskaggs.com/ea/ea-and-take-two-a-2-billion-bargain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
