<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>www.markskaggs.com &#187; Take-Two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://markskaggs.com/tag/take-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://markskaggs.com</link>
	<description>Mark Skaggs Games and Other Fun Adventures</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 15:06:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EA &quot;Take Two Not A Strategic Priority&quot;</title>
		<link>http://markskaggs.com/ea-take-two-not-a-strategic-priority/</link>
		<comments>http://markskaggs.com/ea-take-two-not-a-strategic-priority/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[acquisition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Take-Two]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markskaggs.com/spore/ea-take-two-not-a-strategic-priority/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not that you should believe everything you believe, but www.gamesindustry.biz just posted an article full of quotes by Jeff Brown from EA. I know Jeff, he&#8217;s a good guy and a master at public communication. He also makes some very clear comments (if he was quoted properly) about EA&#8217;s mindset about Take Two. &#8220;Take-Two is [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://markskaggs.com/ea-take-two-not-a-strategic-priority/">EA &quot;Take Two Not A Strategic Priority&quot;</a> appeared first on <a href="http://markskaggs.com">www.markskaggs.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://markskaggs.com/ea-take-two-not-a-strategic-priority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EA and Take Two &#8211; a $2 billion bargain</title>
		<link>http://markskaggs.com/ea-and-take-two-a-2-billion-bargain/</link>
		<comments>http://markskaggs.com/ea-and-take-two-a-2-billion-bargain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 06:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Take-Two]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTA4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://markskaggs.com/ea/ea-and-take-two-a-2-billion-bargain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With the release of GTA4, I looked at the EA bid for Take Two again. It&#8217;s still a numbers game. Literally. EA needs to grow. It&#8217;s stock has been stalled for the past few years (forget for a minute that company execs have heavy stock option components to their compensation). EA wants to acquire Take [...]</p><p>The post <a href="http://markskaggs.com/ea-and-take-two-a-2-billion-bargain/">EA and Take Two &#8211; a $2 billion bargain</a> appeared first on <a href="http://markskaggs.com">www.markskaggs.com</a>.</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://markskaggs.com/ea-and-take-two-a-2-billion-bargain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
